InfoVeriti & KRS.online Alternatives β Poland DBs
Choosing a company database in Poland directly affects lead acquisition cost, contact data quality, and how fast you can react to newly registered businesses. InfoVeriti and KRS.online are the two most frequently mentioned tools among accountants, debt collectors, and B2B sales teams β but are they the best choice for every scenario?
In this article we compare InfoVeriti, KRS.online, and sensible alternatives including nowe-firmy.pl across data freshness, filtering, pricing, and prospecting usefulness. The goal is not an absolute "best tool" ranking, but matching the right platform to your sales model.
Why Companies Look for InfoVeriti and KRS.online Alternatives
InfoVeriti built a strong position as a contractor verification platform β especially for KRS data, capital links, and risk analysis. KRS.online is associated with fast access to corporate registry data. Both work well for due diligence, but sales teams and prospecting agencies often hit the same limitations:
- CEIDG lag. Most new entrepreneurs in Poland register sole proprietorships (JDG), not limited companies. If your goal is "fresh" sales leads, you need CEIDG access close to real time β not just KRS.
- Scaling cost. Enterprise subscriptions or extended report packages grow quickly when you need daily exports of hundreds of records.
- Analytical UI vs. sales UI. Verification tools are designed for risk control, not for building a sales funnel with PKD and region filters.
- No focus on "registration date" trigger. In B2B prospecting, company formation date is the most important buying signal β a new firm needs an accountant, website, insurance, software. Contractor verification platforms rarely optimize UX for this use case.
That is why interest in InfoVeriti alternatives is growing β not because InfoVeriti is bad, but because other tools address specific needs better.
InfoVeriti β Profile, Strengths, and Limitations
InfoVeriti is a comprehensive economic data platform. In practice it is used for:
- verifying contractors before signing agreements,
- analyzing capital links and beneficial owners,
- monitoring KRS changes,
- assessing payment reliability (depending on package).
InfoVeriti strengths:
| Area | Rating | Comment | | :----------------------- | :---------- | :------------------------------------------------- | | KRS data and links | Very good | Deep analysis of corporate structure | | Contractor verification | Very good | Useful before large transactions | | Change monitoring | Good | Alerts on entries, management changes | | New JDG from CEIDG | Limited | Not the platform's main use case | | Export for cold outreach | Average | Requires additional data processing | | Price for small teams | Mediumβhigh | ROI grows with due diligence, not mass prospecting |
InfoVeriti is a tool for compliance, accounting, and collections. If you sell B2B services to newly formed companies and want to be first on the contact list, you likely need a supplement β not a one-to-one replacement, but a dedicated CEIDG lead source.
KRS.online β When It Makes Sense and When It Does Not
KRS.online focuses on National Court Register (KRS) data. For software houses targeting limited companies, investment funds, or enterprise solution providers β it is a sensible starting point.
KRS.online strengths:
- Fast access to corporate entity data.
- Information on management, share capital, representation.
- Useful when selling higher-ACV B2B services.
Limitations for lead generation:
- Registering a limited company takes longer than opening a sole proprietorship β you lose the "day zero" buying moment.
- In Poland, roughly 80% of new entities are sole proprietorships in CEIDG, not companies in KRS.
- Contact data (email, phone) often requires separate enrichment.
- No native workflow for "download today's registered companies with PKD X in Mazowieckie voivodeship".
If your ICP is owners of small service businesses, e-commerce, and local retail β KRS.online covers a minority of the market. If you target capital companies with formal structure β still valuable, but as part of a broader stack.
Official Registers as "Free Alternatives"
Before commercial tools, public sources deserve mention β they are the foundation of every company database in Poland.
CEIDG (ceidg.gov.pl)
The Central Registration and Information on Business (CEIDG) is the main source for sole proprietorship data. It includes business start date, PKD codes, addresses, and entry status. Data is free and legally binding.
Operational downside: no convenient API for daily prospecting for non-technical teams. Manual search for dozens of companies per day does not scale.
KRS (wyszukiwarka-krs.ms.gov.pl)
Official Ministry of Justice search engine. Full reliability, zero cost, but interface designed for verifying individual entities, not building prospecting lists.
REGON (wyszukiwarkaregon.stat.gov.pl)
Statistics Poland (GUS) register. Excellent for REGON number verification and statistical data, but not for monitoring "companies registered yesterday".
These sources are an InfoVeriti alternative for reliability, but not for sales productivity. Hence the role of aggregators.
Commercial Alternatives Comparison β Summary Table
The table below compares the most commonly considered options in 2026. Ratings are practical β based on typical B2B prospecting use cases, not every feature of every platform.
| Criterion | InfoVeriti | KRS.online | nowe-firmy.pl | Manual CEIDG | | :------------------------------------ | :------------------ | :--------- | :-------------------------- | :-------------- | | Main source | KRS + economic data | KRS | CEIDG (daily) | CEIDG | | New JDG daily | Limited | No | Yes, date filter | Yes, manual | | PKD filtering | Yes | Partial | Yes, advanced | Yes, cumbersome | | Region filtering | Yes | Yes | Yes (voivodeship, city) | Yes | | CSV/Excel export | Yes (package) | Yes | Yes, daily delivery | Manual | | Contact data | Variable | Variable | Email, phone when available | From entry only | | Use case: due diligence | β β β β β | β β β β β | β β βββ | β β βββ | | Use case: new company prospecting | β β βββ | β β βββ | β β β β β | β β βββ | | Implementation time | Medium | Medium | Low (minutes) | High | | Monthly cost | Higher | Medium | Affordable | 0 PLN (+ time) |
nowe-firmy.pl β When Is It the Best Alternative?
nowe-firmy.pl was built around one specific problem: how to deliver sales teams a daily list of newly registered CEIDG companies ready for contact. Unlike InfoVeriti (verification) and KRS.online (corporations), nowe-firmy.pl optimizes for:
- Sales trigger "registration date" β filter companies from the last 24h, 7 days, or 30 days.
- PKD segmentation β reach only industries that buy your product (e.g. gastronomy, transport, IT).
- Geolocation β voivodeship, city, county without manual address cleaning.
- Daily delivery β file by email or download from panel, no API programming.
- RODO-safe workflow β data comes from public registers; B2B outreach still requires your own compliance policy (more in our article on legal methods for new company contact data).
This does not mean nowe-firmy.pl replaces InfoVeriti when verifying a company before a 500,000 PLN transaction. It means for a sales team seeking 200 fresh leads monthly in a specific industry β nowe-firmy.pl delivers faster ROI than a due diligence platform.
Other Market Tools β Brief Overview
Beyond the three main players in the title, the Polish market offers several intermediate solutions:
GUS / bulk REGON files. Available periodically, often delayed, without registration date as a primary field. Good for statistical analysis, weaker for "day one" prospecting.
Apollo, ZoomInfo, Lusha (international). Polish micro-business coverage is often incomplete. Useful for export and LinkedIn, but expensive with CEIDG gaps.
Custom CEIDG scrapers. Technically possible but requires maintenance, API change monitoring, and compliance. Hidden cost is developer time.
LinkedIn Sales Navigator. Not a company database, but complements contact after entity identification. Without a list of new NIPs from CEIDG, it is like searching for a needle in a haystack.
Selection Scenarios β Which Tool for Whom?
Scenario 1: Accounting firm seeking new JDG clients
Recommendation: nowe-firmy.pl + occasional CEIDG verification.
A new business is the moment when an entrepreneur chooses an accountant. InfoVeriti is not optimized for a daily registration feed. KRS.online does not cover most of your leads.
Scenario 2: Collections and contractor risk analysis
Recommendation: InfoVeriti (optionally supplemented by KRS.online).
Here depth of data on links, history, and structure matters β not yesterday's CEIDG entry freshness.
Scenario 3: Software house targeting limited companies
Recommendation: KRS.online + InfoVeriti for verification + nowe-firmy.pl for JDG that may be simpler entry points (sole proprietors often incorporate after a year).
Scenario 4: Marketing agency β websites for new companies
Recommendation: nowe-firmy.pl as primary source.
A company without a website on registration day is an ideal lead. PKD filter (e.g. gastronomy, beauty) + city gives a list ready for personalized cold email. See also how to get web design clients.
Scenario 5: Corporation with compliance and sales departments
Recommendation: Hybrid stack.
InfoVeriti for contractor onboarding, nowe-firmy.pl for prospecting pipeline. These are not mutually exclusive β different layers of the process.
Hidden Costs β What to Watch When Migrating
Changing tools rarely comes down to comparing price lists. Consider:
Team onboarding time. InfoVeriti and KRS.online have steep learning curves for salespeople unfamiliar with KRS. nowe-firmy.pl is closer to "open file and call".
Cost of stale data. A database from 6 months ago has high email bounce rate and damages domain reputation. CEIDG freshness is competitive advantage β especially in 2026 when cold email requires precision.
CRM integration. Check if export is compatible with Pipedrive, HubSpot, or Salesforce. nowe-firmy.pl delivers structured CSV; InfoVeriti may require additional field mapping.
GDPR compliance. Downloading data from a public register does not exempt you from legal outreach obligations. Read our guide: new company contact data β legal GDPR methods.
How to Test an Alternative Before an Annual Contract
Before signing an annual InfoVeriti or other vendor contract, run this 7-day test:
- Define ICP β PKD, voivodeship, size (JDG vs company).
- Download a sample of 50 companies from each source under consideration.
- Verify freshness β compare registration date with today's date.
- Check contact β how many records have email or phone?
- Send 20 personalized messages from each list (A/B).
- Measure reply rate β not record count, but responses.
- Calculate CPL β tool cost / qualified conversations.
In prospecting tests on new JDG, CEIDG-focused alternatives (including nowe-firmy.pl) systematically beat KRS-centric platforms on reply rate β because you reach companies before they have suppliers.
Summary β InfoVeriti, KRS.online, or an Alternative?
| If you need⦠| Choose | | :---------------------------------------- | :------------ | | Contractor verification and link analysis | InfoVeriti | | Corporate entity data | KRS.online | | Daily leads from new JDG (CEIDG) | nowe-firmy.pl | | Zero budget, lots of time | Manual CEIDG | | Full market picture | Hybrid stack |
InfoVeriti and KRS.online are solid tools β in their niches. Looking for InfoVeriti alternatives does not have to mean abandoning them entirely. Most often it means adding a prospecting layer these platforms were not designed to deliver.
If your business grows by reaching companies in the first days after registration, check the new companies database at nowe-firmy.pl β the fastest path from CEIDG register to your CRM.
FAQ β Frequently Asked Questions
1. Does nowe-firmy.pl replace InfoVeriti?
Not fully. InfoVeriti serves due diligence and capital link analysis. nowe-firmy.pl serves daily prospecting of new JDG from CEIDG. In many companies both tools coexist.
2. Does KRS.online cover sole proprietorships?
No. JDG registers in CEIDG, not KRS. If your target is micro-businesses and freelancers β you need a CEIDG source.
3. Which alternative is cheapest?
Official registers (CEIDG, KRS) are free but cost time. Among commercial tools, nowe-firmy.pl offers an affordable subscription focused on prospecting, while InfoVeriti is more expensive with full analytical packages.
4. Is InfoVeriti data more current than CEIDG?
InfoVeriti aggregates data from multiple sources, but for new JDG the source of truth remains CEIDG. Aggregators like nowe-firmy.pl sync with CEIDG daily, giving comparable or better freshness for prospecting.
5. How to legally use data from these databases in cold email?
Data from public registers can be processed, but B2B offer sending requires a legal basis (e.g. legitimate interest) and opt-out. Details in our article on GDPR and new company contact data.
6. Is it worth building your own CEIDG scraper instead of paying for a tool?
Only if you have a technical team and budget for maintenance. For most agencies and sales departments, a ready aggregator (e.g. nowe-firmy.pl) has lower TCO than in-house development.
Share article
Help others grow their business